Discussion 1Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:Which of the cognitive biases discussed in this section do you think you might be most subject to?What might you do to compensate for this bias factor?Discussion 2Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 wordsIf someone is known to have been dishonest about one thing, should we automatically be suspicious of his or her honesty regarding other things?Discussion 3Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:Suppose a university teacher wants to know whether or not requiring attendance improves student learning. How could she find out? Describe an experiment that an instructor might actually use.Review the experiments posted by your classmates. Evaluate the pros and cons of their proposals, and when applicable, suggest improvements or ask follow-up questions.Discussion 4Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:Discuss an example of a rhetorical strategy or rhetorical fallacy that you might hear in the workplace.How might you use reasoning to counteract these arguments?Discussion 5Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:In the textbook, “Vehicles are prohibited on the paths in the park” is used as an example of a law that might require clarification. Decide whether the law should be interpreted to forbid motorcycles, bicycles, children’s pedal cars, and battery-powered remote-control cars. On what grounds are you deciding each of these cases?